<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spare No Expense? &#8211; When spending more money actually decreases performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onvectorconsulting.com/the-cost-of-safety-does-the-law-of-diminishing-returns-apply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onvectorconsulting.com/the-cost-of-safety-does-the-law-of-diminishing-returns-apply/</link>
	<description>Line of Sight to Performance Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 18:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.18</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redge</title>
		<link>http://www.onvectorconsulting.com/the-cost-of-safety-does-the-law-of-diminishing-returns-apply/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagementperspectives.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that we have exhausted billions of dollars and have little to show for it (at least that we&#039;re aware of). How many &quot;potential threats&quot; have been halted as a result of the added security?  We are reacting - not preventing - as though lightning will strike the same way twice.

Sadly, any of the potentially explosive liquids and items are collected into a barrel and remain on site at the airport.  We assume the threat is on the plane itself.  I suggest this is a gross oversight.  What about the airport itself?

I am as concerned that we have spent billions on the &quot;obvious, after-the-fact&quot; tactics.  I understand Israel uses a multi-tiered screening process that may even begin before you even arrive at the airport itself!  They haven&#039;t had an incident - ever that I&#039;m aware of.

We are no more secure now than ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we have exhausted billions of dollars and have little to show for it (at least that we&#8217;re aware of). How many &#8220;potential threats&#8221; have been halted as a result of the added security?  We are reacting &#8211; not preventing &#8211; as though lightning will strike the same way twice.</p>
<p>Sadly, any of the potentially explosive liquids and items are collected into a barrel and remain on site at the airport.  We assume the threat is on the plane itself.  I suggest this is a gross oversight.  What about the airport itself?</p>
<p>I am as concerned that we have spent billions on the &#8220;obvious, after-the-fact&#8221; tactics.  I understand Israel uses a multi-tiered screening process that may even begin before you even arrive at the airport itself!  They haven&#8217;t had an incident &#8211; ever that I&#8217;m aware of.</p>
<p>We are no more secure now than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Cost of Security- Does the law of diminishing returns apply? « Performance Perspectives -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.onvectorconsulting.com/the-cost-of-safety-does-the-law-of-diminishing-returns-apply/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention The Cost of Security- Does the law of diminishing returns apply? « Performance Perspectives -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagementperspectives.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tammy McLeod , Bob Champagne. Bob Champagne said: Runaway Cost of Security...and the need for better performance accountability...http://bit.ly/iezKN0 [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tammy McLeod , Bob Champagne. Bob Champagne said: Runaway Cost of Security&#8230;and the need for better performance accountability&#8230;<a href="http://bit.ly/iezKN0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/iezKN0</a> [&#8230;] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
